Which border taxes? Origin and destination regimes with fiscal competition in output and emission taxes

∗We thank the referees and particularly the editor, Robin Boadway, for their constructive comments. This paper posits a two-stage game in tax regime and tax rates to study the property of second-best emission and output taxes in a two-country world with an atmospheric externality. It shows that (i) either the destination-destination or the origin-origin tax regime may constitute the subgame perfect Nash equilibrium of this game; (ii) either regime may Pareto-dominate the other; (iii) it is possible to have a prisoner’s dilemma game where the origin-origin regime Pareto-dominates but the choice of the destination regime is the dominant strategy for each country. Other results include (iv) Under origin-origin regime: the output tax is used for fiscal competition; the emission tax is set at a rate equal to the (national) marginal social damage of emissions; and public goods are provided sub-optimally. (v) Under destination-destination regime: the output tax is ineffective as an instrument for fiscal competition; the emission tax is used not only for combating pollution but also for tax competition; the tax is set at a rate below the (national) marginal social damage of emissions; emissions are pushed above their closed-economy level; the provision of public goods are optimal