This paper reports the results of an experimental test of the warm glow hypothesis. A participant is presented with the opportunity to contribute from her own endowment to a charity of choice. The experiment is designed so that a pure altruist has no incentive to donate. The amount the designated charity will receive is preset; any contribution by the participant crowds out dollar-for-dollar giving by the proctor. We find that participants, on average, donated 20 percent of their endowments and that approximately 57 percent of the participants made a donation
BACKGROUND: The benevolence hypothesis (both donor and recipient gain) suggests that blood donors, c...
BACKGROUND: The benevolence hypothesis (both donor and recipient gain) suggests that blood donors, c...
We partnered with Alaska’s Pick.Click.Give. programme to implement a statewide natural field experim...
This paper reports the results of an experimental test of the warm glow hypothesis. A participant is...
This paper presents results from a modified dictator experiment aimed at distinguishing and quantify...
This paper presents results from a modi\u85ed dictator experiment aimed at distinguishing and quanti...
This paper presents results from a modified dictator experiment aimed at distinguishing and quantify...
Running conventional laboratory experiments (i.e., with a standard student subject pool) is common p...
Running conventional laboratory experiments (i.e., with a standard student subject pool) is common p...
Running conventional laboratory experiments (i.e., with a standard student subject pool) is common p...
This paper presents results from a modified dictator experiment aimed at distinguishing and quantify...
Running conventional laboratory experiments (i.e., with a standard student subject pool) is common p...
This paper presents theoretical and empirical analyses of experiments that test competing theories o...
In some instances, charities insist on donors giving more than some fixed, minimum amount. In many o...
We partnered with Alaska's Pick.Click.Give. programme to implement a statewide natural field experim...
BACKGROUND: The benevolence hypothesis (both donor and recipient gain) suggests that blood donors, c...
BACKGROUND: The benevolence hypothesis (both donor and recipient gain) suggests that blood donors, c...
We partnered with Alaska’s Pick.Click.Give. programme to implement a statewide natural field experim...
This paper reports the results of an experimental test of the warm glow hypothesis. A participant is...
This paper presents results from a modified dictator experiment aimed at distinguishing and quantify...
This paper presents results from a modi\u85ed dictator experiment aimed at distinguishing and quanti...
This paper presents results from a modified dictator experiment aimed at distinguishing and quantify...
Running conventional laboratory experiments (i.e., with a standard student subject pool) is common p...
Running conventional laboratory experiments (i.e., with a standard student subject pool) is common p...
Running conventional laboratory experiments (i.e., with a standard student subject pool) is common p...
This paper presents results from a modified dictator experiment aimed at distinguishing and quantify...
Running conventional laboratory experiments (i.e., with a standard student subject pool) is common p...
This paper presents theoretical and empirical analyses of experiments that test competing theories o...
In some instances, charities insist on donors giving more than some fixed, minimum amount. In many o...
We partnered with Alaska's Pick.Click.Give. programme to implement a statewide natural field experim...
BACKGROUND: The benevolence hypothesis (both donor and recipient gain) suggests that blood donors, c...
BACKGROUND: The benevolence hypothesis (both donor and recipient gain) suggests that blood donors, c...
We partnered with Alaska’s Pick.Click.Give. programme to implement a statewide natural field experim...