Using Unigram and Bigram Language Models for Monolingual and Cross-Language IR

Due to the lack of explicit word boundaries in Chinese, and Japanese, and to some extent in Korean, an additional problem in IR in these languages is to determine the appropriate indexing units. For CLIR with these languages, we also need to determine translation units. Both words and n-grams of characters have been used in IR in these languages; however, only words have been used as translation units in previous studies. In this paper, we compare the utilization of words and n-grams for both monolingual and cross-lingual IR in these languages. Our experiments show that Chinese character n-grams are reasonable alternative indexing and translation units to words, and they lead to retrieval effectiveness comparable to or higher than words. For Japanese and Korean IR, bi-grams or a combination of bigrams and unigrams produce the highest effectiveness