Systematic risk in emerging markets: The D-CAPM

There is by now a growing literature arguing against the use of the CAPM to estimate required returns on equity in emerging markets (EMs). One of the characteristics of this model is that it measures risk by beta, which follows from an equilibrium in which investors display mean–variance behavior. In that framework, risk is assessed by the variance of returns, a questionable and restrictive measure of risk. The semivariance of returns is a more plausible measure of risk and can be used to generate an alternative behavioral hypothesis (mean–semivariance behavior), an alternative measure of risk for diversified investors (the downside beta), and an alternative pricing model (the downside CAPM, or D-CAPM for short). The empirical evidence discussed below for the entire Morgan Stanley Capital Indices database of EMs clearly supports the downside beta and the D-CAPM over beta and the CAPM