Incorrect versions of Figures 5 and 6 containing nor-malization errors were accidentally published by Borcherdt (2002). They should be replaced with the figures shown here. The text and tabulated regression values published in Borch-erdt (2002) are correct and refer to the figures shown here. Figure 5. Borcherdt—Average spectral ratio for the short-period band for site class D (a) and site class C (b). The empirical data as derived using the hypocentral distance norm and the Abrahamson and Silva (A&S) spectral norm at 0.3 sec are plotted on each figure. Corresponding regression curves, 95 % confidence limits for the observed values, and the 80 % confidence limits for the ordinate to the true population regression line are shown. 374 Err...
In the original publication of this article, a labelling error was made in plotting the gain of the ...
The original version of this Article contained an error in a sentence in the Results section which i...
International audienceIn this erratum, we provide corrected sets of r 01,10,02 difference ratio valu...
There are two errors in the previous erratum to the manu-script by Campbell (1997). These errors sho...
Due to an error at the Press, in Table 1 data are incorrect for HUDF 4650 for the J, F160W, K, and m...
There is an error in Equation (12) and in the subsequent description. In fact, Equation (12) should ...
In a recent email, K. Heng informed us that the curves he provided, which were used for Figure 2 of ...
The in-text citations for Figures 6–10 are incorrect. The in-text citations to Figure 6 should be to...
In the original article, there was a mistake in Table S5 as published. The normal values for “SDNN” ...
For both above papers, there were mistakes in calculation of the spectral index errors in Tables 3 w...
The original version of this Article contained an error in the order of the Figures. Figures 1, 2, 3...
There was an error in reported parameter estimates in Table 3. The “Phytase ” parameter for feed con...
This is an erratum for the paper “The Fornax Deep Survey (FDS) with VST VI. Optical properties of th...
International audienceIn the paper ‘‘Radiation belt electron precipitation by man-made VLF transmiss...
In this Letter, we omitted to cite preliminary results from the low-energy extension of the Pierre A...
In the original publication of this article, a labelling error was made in plotting the gain of the ...
The original version of this Article contained an error in a sentence in the Results section which i...
International audienceIn this erratum, we provide corrected sets of r 01,10,02 difference ratio valu...
There are two errors in the previous erratum to the manu-script by Campbell (1997). These errors sho...
Due to an error at the Press, in Table 1 data are incorrect for HUDF 4650 for the J, F160W, K, and m...
There is an error in Equation (12) and in the subsequent description. In fact, Equation (12) should ...
In a recent email, K. Heng informed us that the curves he provided, which were used for Figure 2 of ...
The in-text citations for Figures 6–10 are incorrect. The in-text citations to Figure 6 should be to...
In the original article, there was a mistake in Table S5 as published. The normal values for “SDNN” ...
For both above papers, there were mistakes in calculation of the spectral index errors in Tables 3 w...
The original version of this Article contained an error in the order of the Figures. Figures 1, 2, 3...
There was an error in reported parameter estimates in Table 3. The “Phytase ” parameter for feed con...
This is an erratum for the paper “The Fornax Deep Survey (FDS) with VST VI. Optical properties of th...
International audienceIn the paper ‘‘Radiation belt electron precipitation by man-made VLF transmiss...
In this Letter, we omitted to cite preliminary results from the low-energy extension of the Pierre A...
In the original publication of this article, a labelling error was made in plotting the gain of the ...
The original version of this Article contained an error in a sentence in the Results section which i...
International audienceIn this erratum, we provide corrected sets of r 01,10,02 difference ratio valu...