The concept of evidence is among the central concerns of epistemology broadly construed. As such, it has long engaged the intellectual energies of both philosophers of science and epistemologists of a more traditional variety. Here I briefly survey some of the more important ideas to have emerged from this tradition of reflection. I then look somewhat more closely at an issue that has recently come to the fore, largely as a result of Williamson (2000): that of whether one’s evidence supervenes on one’s non-factive mental states
This is the introduction to Moretti, Luca and Nikolaj Pedersen (eds), Non-Evidentialist Epistemology...
On the phenomenal view of evidence, seemings are evidence. More precisely, if it seems to S that p, ...
In previous papers we discussed two aspects of state of mind: (I) where it was used to prove an act ...
The concept of evidence is among the central concerns of epistemology broadly construed. As such, it...
We all have an intuitive grasp of the concept of evidence. Evidence makes beliefs reasonable, justi...
ABSTRACT: Questions about the transparency of evidence are central to debates between factive and no...
We draw a distinction between belief and evidence and develop two accounts to characterize these con...
Timothy Williamson’s Knowledge and its Limits has been highly influential since the beginning of thi...
Questions about the transparency of evidence are central to debates between factive and non-factive ...
I evaluate non-factive or truth-insensitive accounts of the ordinary concepts used to evaluate belie...
This (yet unpublished) paper argues that some of the data about the acquisition of knowledge and bel...
It is no secret that scientists argue. They argue about theories. But even more, they argue about th...
In previous papers we discussed two aspects of state of mind: (I) where it was used to prove an act ...
ABSTRACT: This paper surveys and critically assesses existing theories of evidence with respect to f...
The concept of evidence is implied by distinct kinds of cognitive and reasoning processes carried ou...
This is the introduction to Moretti, Luca and Nikolaj Pedersen (eds), Non-Evidentialist Epistemology...
On the phenomenal view of evidence, seemings are evidence. More precisely, if it seems to S that p, ...
In previous papers we discussed two aspects of state of mind: (I) where it was used to prove an act ...
The concept of evidence is among the central concerns of epistemology broadly construed. As such, it...
We all have an intuitive grasp of the concept of evidence. Evidence makes beliefs reasonable, justi...
ABSTRACT: Questions about the transparency of evidence are central to debates between factive and no...
We draw a distinction between belief and evidence and develop two accounts to characterize these con...
Timothy Williamson’s Knowledge and its Limits has been highly influential since the beginning of thi...
Questions about the transparency of evidence are central to debates between factive and non-factive ...
I evaluate non-factive or truth-insensitive accounts of the ordinary concepts used to evaluate belie...
This (yet unpublished) paper argues that some of the data about the acquisition of knowledge and bel...
It is no secret that scientists argue. They argue about theories. But even more, they argue about th...
In previous papers we discussed two aspects of state of mind: (I) where it was used to prove an act ...
ABSTRACT: This paper surveys and critically assesses existing theories of evidence with respect to f...
The concept of evidence is implied by distinct kinds of cognitive and reasoning processes carried ou...
This is the introduction to Moretti, Luca and Nikolaj Pedersen (eds), Non-Evidentialist Epistemology...
On the phenomenal view of evidence, seemings are evidence. More precisely, if it seems to S that p, ...
In previous papers we discussed two aspects of state of mind: (I) where it was used to prove an act ...