Original for cover picture by courtesy of WWF-UK.

This report provides a triple bottom line analysis of the operations of WWF-UK's Panda House headquarters, including a quantification of the associated annual Ecological Footprint, carbon footprint, climate footprint and other economic, social and environmental indicators. For carbon, the analysis undertaken is consistent with the Greenhouse Gas Protocol, established by the World Business Council for Sustainable Development. Under the GHG Protocol, Scope 1 includes direct emissions for an organisation, Scope 2 includes emissions from power generation (electricity) and Scope 3 includes the remaining indirect emissions in the supply chain triggered by an organisation’s expenditure. This study has provided a boundary free analysis of all these levels ensuring that the results are comprehensive, comparable and complete. This process has been undertaken for all the indicators. The key findings being: In terms of environmental impacts, the majority appear in Scope 3 (about 97 % for the carbon footprint for example, and 95 % for the Ecological Footprint), i.e. indirect impacts along the supply chain. Direct emissions are extremely low reflecting good in-house management of energy. Scope 2 emissions are also extremely low relating to the fact that electricit