Is there a distinction between questions of fact and questions of language? Many philosophers have said no. But a version of the distinction is ubiquitous, in philosophy and elsewhere, in the notion of a verbal dispute. Intuitively, a dispute between two parties is verbal when the two parties agree on the relevant facts about a domain of concern, and just disagree about the language use
In this paper, I introduce the articles contained in this special issue, and I briefly explain some ...
What is the nature of language? Does it exist as an ideal object, before and above verbal communicat...
Niniejsza dysertacja dotyczy filozofii języka, a w szczególności kwestii znaczenia. Autorka odwołują...
To say that a philosophical dispute is ‘merely verbal’ seems to be an important diagnosis. If that d...
Whether a dispute is verbal is important to figure out because it appears to make a huge difference ...
The philosophical interest of verbal disputes is twofold. First, they play a key role in philosophic...
It is common to criticize a debate by alleging that it is a “merely verbal dispute.” But how conclus...
2013-05-09The purpose of my dissertation is to explore the nature of merely verbal disputes in gener...
In philosophy, there is much discussion about whether disagreements about taste, such as whether a c...
abstract: One activity for which philosophers are perhaps best known is having disputes with one ano...
This paper develops a puzzle about non-merely-verbal disputes. At first sight, it would seem that a ...
Attempts at defining a verbal dispute commonly depend on the following principle: (PVD) If linguisti...
In this paper, I offer a new characterization of what makes a dispute merely verbal. This new chara...
In constructing semantic theories of normative and evaluative terms, philosophers have commonly depl...
Verbal disputes are often seen as closely related to a lack of substantivity. However, a systematic ...
In this paper, I introduce the articles contained in this special issue, and I briefly explain some ...
What is the nature of language? Does it exist as an ideal object, before and above verbal communicat...
Niniejsza dysertacja dotyczy filozofii języka, a w szczególności kwestii znaczenia. Autorka odwołują...
To say that a philosophical dispute is ‘merely verbal’ seems to be an important diagnosis. If that d...
Whether a dispute is verbal is important to figure out because it appears to make a huge difference ...
The philosophical interest of verbal disputes is twofold. First, they play a key role in philosophic...
It is common to criticize a debate by alleging that it is a “merely verbal dispute.” But how conclus...
2013-05-09The purpose of my dissertation is to explore the nature of merely verbal disputes in gener...
In philosophy, there is much discussion about whether disagreements about taste, such as whether a c...
abstract: One activity for which philosophers are perhaps best known is having disputes with one ano...
This paper develops a puzzle about non-merely-verbal disputes. At first sight, it would seem that a ...
Attempts at defining a verbal dispute commonly depend on the following principle: (PVD) If linguisti...
In this paper, I offer a new characterization of what makes a dispute merely verbal. This new chara...
In constructing semantic theories of normative and evaluative terms, philosophers have commonly depl...
Verbal disputes are often seen as closely related to a lack of substantivity. However, a systematic ...
In this paper, I introduce the articles contained in this special issue, and I briefly explain some ...
What is the nature of language? Does it exist as an ideal object, before and above verbal communicat...
Niniejsza dysertacja dotyczy filozofii języka, a w szczególności kwestii znaczenia. Autorka odwołują...
DOI
Add to ORKG