Materialist Method

According to neo-Hegelian readings, Marx’s theoretical exposition deteriorates after the Grundrisse. He is said to have sacrificed his (Hegelian) dialectical method on the altar of popularization. In arguing against such readings, this paper interprets Marx’s writings as always a ‘‘work in progress’ ’ in which real advances are achieved. The author stresses the high stakes in these alternative readings. The neo-Hegelian readings tend to disconnect from Marx and Marxism. In contrast, the author articulates and develops the relevance of Marx (and especially his critique of political economy and historical materialist method) to Marxist analysis of con-temporary capitalism. He focuses on the special importance of grasping Marx and Marxism as ‘‘works in progress’ ’ in this time of enormous structural ruptures and transformations