Abstract: We compare three forms of communication and punishment as incentives to increase contributions to public goods in laboratory experiments. We find, as in earlier experiments, that face-to-face communication has very strong effects, but surprisingly that verbal communication through a chat room preserving anonymity and excluding facial expression and other physical cues was almost as efficient. Numerical communication, via computer terminals, had no net effect on contributions or efficiency. Punishment, as in earlier experiments, increased contributions but because of its cost had little net effect on efficiency
A laboratory experiment where human subjects play a repeated public goods game with high-powered pun...
Previous research has suggested that communication and especially promises increase cooperation in l...
This note aims at discussing the reasons why individuals facing situations of anonymous interaction ...
Abstract: We compare three forms of communication and punishment as incentives to increase contribut...
We compare three forms of communication and punishment as incentives to increase contributions to pu...
We compare three forms of communication and punishment as incentives to increase contributions to pu...
We study how communication affects cooperation in an experimental public goods environment with puni...
In this paper, we compare the cause and effect of immaterial rewards and sanctions on voluntary cont...
We study how communication affects cooperation in an experimental public goods environment with puni...
We let subjects in a voluntary contribution experiment make non-binding numerical announcements abou...
In this article, we compare the causes and effects of immaterial rewards and sanctions on cooperatio...
We let subjects in a voluntary contribution experiment make non-binding numerical announcements abou...
When subjects can make non-binding announcements of possible contributions to a public good numerica...
Previous research has suggested that communication and especially promises increase cooperation in l...
A number of studies have shown that peer punishment can sustain cooperation in public good games. Th...
A laboratory experiment where human subjects play a repeated public goods game with high-powered pun...
Previous research has suggested that communication and especially promises increase cooperation in l...
This note aims at discussing the reasons why individuals facing situations of anonymous interaction ...
Abstract: We compare three forms of communication and punishment as incentives to increase contribut...
We compare three forms of communication and punishment as incentives to increase contributions to pu...
We compare three forms of communication and punishment as incentives to increase contributions to pu...
We study how communication affects cooperation in an experimental public goods environment with puni...
In this paper, we compare the cause and effect of immaterial rewards and sanctions on voluntary cont...
We study how communication affects cooperation in an experimental public goods environment with puni...
We let subjects in a voluntary contribution experiment make non-binding numerical announcements abou...
In this article, we compare the causes and effects of immaterial rewards and sanctions on cooperatio...
We let subjects in a voluntary contribution experiment make non-binding numerical announcements abou...
When subjects can make non-binding announcements of possible contributions to a public good numerica...
Previous research has suggested that communication and especially promises increase cooperation in l...
A number of studies have shown that peer punishment can sustain cooperation in public good games. Th...
A laboratory experiment where human subjects play a repeated public goods game with high-powered pun...
Previous research has suggested that communication and especially promises increase cooperation in l...
This note aims at discussing the reasons why individuals facing situations of anonymous interaction ...