Refereed paper presented to the Australasian Political Studies Association Conference

The British Columbian Citizens ’ Assembly on Electoral Reform comprised a representative group of 160 randomly selected voters who were empowered to review the Province’s electoral system and to decide if change was needed. It first met in January 2004 and issued its final report in December of that year. The Assembly has since been hailed as a democratic invention and attracted worldwide interest as a remarkable experiment in deliberative democracy. Its Terms of Reference required that it consult British Columbians. It did so via a series of public hearings held across the Province, and by establishing a website to publicise its purpose and to obtain public input. Hence the Citizen’s Assembly provides a case study or natural experiment which permits the comparative assessment of two very different forms of political communication—one traditional and the other a form of ‘e-consultation ’ relying on newer information and communications technology. Based on published sources as well as interviews with former members of the Assembly, this paper investigates the public input the Assembly obtained, and considers whether ‘e-consultation’—as is often claimed—does allow citizens to genuinely contribute to the making of public policy