Explaining the development of false memories

We review six explanatory dimensions of false memory in children that are rele-vant to forensic practice: measurement, development, social factors, individual differ-ences, varieties of memories and memory judgments, and varieties of procedures that induce false memories. We conclude that, despite greater fidelity to real-world false memory contexts, recent studies fail to use known techniques that separate mere ac-quiescence from memory changes. Acquiescence and memory interact in interroga-tion through a dynamic process of construing both questions and memories. Fuzzy-trace theory’s verbatim–gist distinction offers an explanation for how this con-strual process can transform acquiescence into false memory. Acquiescence and false memory are further exacerbated by individual differences in cognition, personality, and social factors. To avoid such effects, interviewers should not encourage children to consider, imagine, or interpret alternative versions of events, especially with re-peated specific questions rather than open-ended free recall. The goal of interviews should be not only to separate truth from falsity, but also to separate the fuzzy truth, the construal of questions and gist memories, from the verbatim ‘‘just-the-facts’’ truth required for the administration of justice. 2002 Elsevier Science (USA)