In this paper, Katz and Searle's controversy over literal meaning will be discussed in the light of relevance theory. Although their notions are drastically different, these notions have their places in utterance interpretation processes and there is no point in deciding whose notion is right. Katz's notion can be characterised as a relevance notion logical form which is an output of the hearer's knowledge of grammar, while Searle's, propositional form, which is a contextually enriched logical form. 1 will introduce a relevance notion literal interpretation which can not only be contrasted with figurative use, but also with non-figurative loose use (e.g. France is hexagonai)
In this paper, we outline a relevance-based approach to pragmatics, the theory of utterance interpre...
This is the first draft of a long overdue book for Cambridge University Press. Bibliographical refer...
In this paper, we outline a relevance-based approach to pragmatics, the theory of utterance interpre...
In this paper, Katz and Searle's controversy over literal meaning will be discussed in the light of ...
Some traditional accounts view literal meaning (LM) as the central component in the process of meani...
grantor: University of TorontoMy topic is the nature and scope of literal language. Broadl...
The human capacity for language is beyond doubt a very special ability and this thesis aims at shedd...
In the past decades, there has been much progress in the formal Semantics of ordinary language. Logi...
What is Meaning? addresses “an unsolved problem at the heart of our conception of what meaning is, a...
Many theorists take the view that literal meaning can be one of a number of factors to be weighed i...
Analytic philosophy of language has been largely devoted to the study of literal meaning, or what is...
In both Japanese and English, and all the other languages as well, it often occurs that even if a sp...
The problem of determining intended meaning is a key topic in the study of linguistic processes (Gri...
Gibbs (2002) argues that there is no psycholinguistic evidence for the existence of linguistic seman...
The distinction between literal and figurative use is well-known and embedded in ‘folk linguistics’....
In this paper, we outline a relevance-based approach to pragmatics, the theory of utterance interpre...
This is the first draft of a long overdue book for Cambridge University Press. Bibliographical refer...
In this paper, we outline a relevance-based approach to pragmatics, the theory of utterance interpre...
In this paper, Katz and Searle's controversy over literal meaning will be discussed in the light of ...
Some traditional accounts view literal meaning (LM) as the central component in the process of meani...
grantor: University of TorontoMy topic is the nature and scope of literal language. Broadl...
The human capacity for language is beyond doubt a very special ability and this thesis aims at shedd...
In the past decades, there has been much progress in the formal Semantics of ordinary language. Logi...
What is Meaning? addresses “an unsolved problem at the heart of our conception of what meaning is, a...
Many theorists take the view that literal meaning can be one of a number of factors to be weighed i...
Analytic philosophy of language has been largely devoted to the study of literal meaning, or what is...
In both Japanese and English, and all the other languages as well, it often occurs that even if a sp...
The problem of determining intended meaning is a key topic in the study of linguistic processes (Gri...
Gibbs (2002) argues that there is no psycholinguistic evidence for the existence of linguistic seman...
The distinction between literal and figurative use is well-known and embedded in ‘folk linguistics’....
In this paper, we outline a relevance-based approach to pragmatics, the theory of utterance interpre...
This is the first draft of a long overdue book for Cambridge University Press. Bibliographical refer...
In this paper, we outline a relevance-based approach to pragmatics, the theory of utterance interpre...