Gleason [G] introduced in 1958 the notion of projective cover for compact Hausdorff spaces. Later, Ponomarev [PI, P2, P3] and Strauss [S] independently obtained more general results. A detailed historical survey is given in [Wi2]. The projective cover, also known as the absolute, of a space X, denoted E(X), is characterized as that extremally dis connected space which is the perfect, irreducible preimage of X. Its existence and uniqueness are established in the references, above, for regular topological spaces. Many properties, particularly those of the compactness gender, are preserved from a regular topological space (here we assume all spaces to be completely regular) to its pro jective cover. Of import is that a space X has paracompact ...
AbstractLet A and B be subspaces of an ordinal. It is proved that the product A×B is countably parac...
summary:Paracompactness ($=2$-paracompactness) and normality of a subspace $Y$ in a space $X$ define...
Abstract. In this paper, we prove: (1) The product Q × (ω1 + 1) is not base-cover metacompact, where...
Gleason [G] introduced in 1958 the notion of projective cover for compact Hausdorff spaces. Later, P...
This paper will be devoted to an exposition of some of the basic properties of paracompact spaces. I...
All spaces considered here are assume to be Hausdorff. Let $X $ be a space and $\mathcal{U} $ a cove...
AbstractAll spaces are assumed to be Tychonoff. A space X is called projectively P (where P is a top...
If (X,d) is a pseudometric space, a cover ~ = (G) I a aE is said to be Lebesgue if there exists a r...
AbstractIt is shown that a regular space is collectionwise normal and countably paracompact if every...
AbstractIn [7], Tamano raised the question of whether or not a space which admits a closure- preserv...
We shall introduce the relatively countably n-paracompactness in a total space (n = 1,2,3) and discu...
AbstractIn 1971 H. Tamano asked the question: Is a space X paracompact if X has a closure-preserving...
All spaces are assumed to be $T_{1} $ , but compact spaces and paracompact spaces are assumed to be ...
AbstractWe show that every separable regular pp space and every normal ppclosed space is paracompact...
summary:We show that a space is MCP (monotone countable paracompact) if and only if it has property ...
AbstractLet A and B be subspaces of an ordinal. It is proved that the product A×B is countably parac...
summary:Paracompactness ($=2$-paracompactness) and normality of a subspace $Y$ in a space $X$ define...
Abstract. In this paper, we prove: (1) The product Q × (ω1 + 1) is not base-cover metacompact, where...
Gleason [G] introduced in 1958 the notion of projective cover for compact Hausdorff spaces. Later, P...
This paper will be devoted to an exposition of some of the basic properties of paracompact spaces. I...
All spaces considered here are assume to be Hausdorff. Let $X $ be a space and $\mathcal{U} $ a cove...
AbstractAll spaces are assumed to be Tychonoff. A space X is called projectively P (where P is a top...
If (X,d) is a pseudometric space, a cover ~ = (G) I a aE is said to be Lebesgue if there exists a r...
AbstractIt is shown that a regular space is collectionwise normal and countably paracompact if every...
AbstractIn [7], Tamano raised the question of whether or not a space which admits a closure- preserv...
We shall introduce the relatively countably n-paracompactness in a total space (n = 1,2,3) and discu...
AbstractIn 1971 H. Tamano asked the question: Is a space X paracompact if X has a closure-preserving...
All spaces are assumed to be $T_{1} $ , but compact spaces and paracompact spaces are assumed to be ...
AbstractWe show that every separable regular pp space and every normal ppclosed space is paracompact...
summary:We show that a space is MCP (monotone countable paracompact) if and only if it has property ...
AbstractLet A and B be subspaces of an ordinal. It is proved that the product A×B is countably parac...
summary:Paracompactness ($=2$-paracompactness) and normality of a subspace $Y$ in a space $X$ define...
Abstract. In this paper, we prove: (1) The product Q × (ω1 + 1) is not base-cover metacompact, where...