Book Reviews 689

inquiry of that kind would demonstrate how the methods of science thus defined can accomplish its goals. So there is no possibility, in principle, of replacing traditional epistemology with naturalized epistemology. The whole enterprise is rooted in a category mistake. Somewhat more subtle but no less mistaken is the very idea that the empirical study of cognitive processes could be successfully pursued in the absence of the epistemic standards that cognitive systems must instantiate in order to qualify as rational. We cannot know which cognitive processes are rational without an adequate conception of rationality, which presupposes a philosophical defense. Traditional philosophy, like traditional epistemology, has nothing to fear from those who confound philosophy with psychology, or rationality with cognition. Acknowledgment It has been my pleasure to co-author with Robert Almeder a glossary, which those who want to pursue these issues may wish to consult (Fetzer &amp