In response to overwhelming evidence and the consequences of poor-quality reporting of randomized, controlled trials (RCTs), many medical journals and editorial groups have now endorsed the CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) state-ment, a 22-item checklist and flow diagram. Because CONSORT primarily aimed at improving the quality of reporting of efficacy, only 1 checklist item specifically addressed the reporting of safety. Considerable evidence suggests that reporting of harms-related data from RCTs also needs improvement. Members of the CONSORT Group, including journal editors and scientists
AbstractOverwhelming evidence shows the quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) ...
To comprehend the results of a randomized controlled trial (RCT), readers must understand its design...
To comprehend the results of a randomized controlled trial (RCT), readers must understand its design...
In response to overwhelming evidence and the consequences of poor-quality reporting of randomized, c...
Overwhelming evidence now indicates that the quality of reporting of randomized, controlled trials (...
Overwhelming evidence now indicates that the quality of reporting of randomized, controlled trials (...
Overwhelming evidence now indicates that the quality of report-ing of randomized, controlled trials ...
To comprehend the results of a randomized, controlled trial (RCT), readers must understand its desig...
Objective To determine the standard of reporting of harms-related data, in randomised controlled tri...
To comprehend the results of a randomized, controlled trial (RCT), readers must understand its desig...
Overwhelming evidence shows the quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is not o...
Overwhelming evidence shows the quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is not o...
Overwhelming evidence shows the quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is not o...
Overwhelming evidence shows the quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is not o...
AbstractOverwhelming evidence shows the quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) ...
AbstractOverwhelming evidence shows the quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) ...
To comprehend the results of a randomized controlled trial (RCT), readers must understand its design...
To comprehend the results of a randomized controlled trial (RCT), readers must understand its design...
In response to overwhelming evidence and the consequences of poor-quality reporting of randomized, c...
Overwhelming evidence now indicates that the quality of reporting of randomized, controlled trials (...
Overwhelming evidence now indicates that the quality of reporting of randomized, controlled trials (...
Overwhelming evidence now indicates that the quality of report-ing of randomized, controlled trials ...
To comprehend the results of a randomized, controlled trial (RCT), readers must understand its desig...
Objective To determine the standard of reporting of harms-related data, in randomised controlled tri...
To comprehend the results of a randomized, controlled trial (RCT), readers must understand its desig...
Overwhelming evidence shows the quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is not o...
Overwhelming evidence shows the quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is not o...
Overwhelming evidence shows the quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is not o...
Overwhelming evidence shows the quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is not o...
AbstractOverwhelming evidence shows the quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) ...
AbstractOverwhelming evidence shows the quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) ...
To comprehend the results of a randomized controlled trial (RCT), readers must understand its design...
To comprehend the results of a randomized controlled trial (RCT), readers must understand its design...