Do taxes explain European employment? Indivisible labor, human capital, lotteries, and savings

Adding generous government supplied benefits to Prescott’s (2002) model with em-ployment lotteries and private consumption insurance causes employment to implode and prevents the model from matching outcomes observed in Europe. To understand the role of a ‘not-so-well-known aggregation theory ’ that Prescott uses to rationalize the high labor supply elasticity that underlies his finding that higher taxes on labor have depressed Europe relative to the U.S., this paper compares aggregate outcomes for economies with two arrangements for coping with indivisible labor: (1) employ-ment lotteries plus complete consumption insurance, and (2) individual consumption smoothing via borrowing and lending at a risk-free interest rate. The two arrangements support equivalent outcomes when human capital is not present; when it is present, allocations differ because households ’ reliance on personal savings in the incomplete markets model constrains the ‘career choices ’ that are implicit in their human capital acquisition plans relative to those that can be supported by lotteries and consump-tion insurance in the complete markets model. Nevertheless, the responses of aggregat