Add to ORKGAbstract. The design and implementation of a correct system can be-nefit from employing static techniques for ensuring that the dynamic behaviour satisfies the specification. Many programming languages in-corporate types for ensuring that certain operations are only applied to data of the appropriate form. A natural extension of type checking te-chniques is to enrich the types with annotations and effects that further describe intensional aspects of the dynamic behaviour
The type and effect discipline is a new framework for reconstructing the principal type and the mini...
Types-and-effects are type systems, which allow one to express general semantic properties and to st...
Modern programming languages rely on advanced type systems that detect errors at compile-time. While...
Abstract. The design and implementation of a correct system can benefit from employing static techni...
Type-and-effect systems are a powerful tool for program construction and verification. We describe i...
Type and effect systems significantly extend type systems and allow one to express general semantic ...
Side-effect are ubiquitous in programming. Examples include mutable state, exceptions, non-determini...
use of program operations. They can be classified as either static or dynamic depending on when they...
Most languages fall into one of two camps: either they adopt a unique, static type system, or they a...
Type systems commonly used in practice today fail to capture essential aspects of program behavior: ...
Type systems commonly used in practice today fail to capture essential aspects of program behavior: ...
Programming languages use type systems to reduce number of bugs. Type systems of most languages are ...
Static and dynamic type systems have well-known strengths and weaknesses, and each is better suited ...
Statically typed programming languages allow earlier error checking, better enforcement of disciplin...
We develop an explicit two level system that allows programmers to reason about the behavior of effe...
The type and effect discipline is a new framework for reconstructing the principal type and the mini...
Types-and-effects are type systems, which allow one to express general semantic properties and to st...
Modern programming languages rely on advanced type systems that detect errors at compile-time. While...
Abstract. The design and implementation of a correct system can benefit from employing static techni...
Type-and-effect systems are a powerful tool for program construction and verification. We describe i...
Type and effect systems significantly extend type systems and allow one to express general semantic ...
Side-effect are ubiquitous in programming. Examples include mutable state, exceptions, non-determini...
use of program operations. They can be classified as either static or dynamic depending on when they...
Most languages fall into one of two camps: either they adopt a unique, static type system, or they a...
Type systems commonly used in practice today fail to capture essential aspects of program behavior: ...
Type systems commonly used in practice today fail to capture essential aspects of program behavior: ...
Programming languages use type systems to reduce number of bugs. Type systems of most languages are ...
Static and dynamic type systems have well-known strengths and weaknesses, and each is better suited ...
Statically typed programming languages allow earlier error checking, better enforcement of disciplin...
We develop an explicit two level system that allows programmers to reason about the behavior of effe...
The type and effect discipline is a new framework for reconstructing the principal type and the mini...
Types-and-effects are type systems, which allow one to express general semantic properties and to st...
Modern programming languages rely on advanced type systems that detect errors at compile-time. While...