In a review of the literature on policy diffusion in the states, Berry and Berry (1999) conclude that the “gold standard ” methodological approach to the empirical modeling of these processes is discrete event history analysis. I concur, but find that the literature largely ignores several important issues in the proper specification of these models, including choice of functional form, modeling different mechanisms of diffusion, modeling duration dependence, and spatial autocorrelation in the cross-sections. I use data from Berry and Berry’s (1990) classic study of the diffusion of state lotteries to suggest possible improvements to this research
© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013. All rights are reserved. Diffusion processes are a pr...
Policymakers have to adjudicate between two competing sets of information when making decisions: the...
We present an individual-level theory which explains how decision-making during the policy adoption ...
Policy diffusion research pays virtually no attention to policy content. Yet we should expect conten...
When modeling regional policy diffusion effects, scholars have traditionally made appeals to both so...
A growing literature in public policy, comparative politics and international relations has studied ...
The paper examines the determinants of the diffusion of state lotteries as a process of policy innov...
errors or mistakes are mine. 1 Boehmke I demonstrate a source of bias in the common implementation o...
Several authors (e.g., Brüderl, Diekmann, Yamaguchi) derive hazard rate models of event history anal...
This article builds on the recent policy diffusion literature and attempts to overcome one of its ma...
A comparative approach to policy diffusion work has recently yielded new and interesting results, as...
Two types of explanations of state government innovation have been proposed: internal determinants m...
This article makes a conceptual and theoretical contri- bution to the study of diffusion. The author...
Ideas often have a way of spreading. This is certainly true in the case of American states; innovati...
Quantitative-oriented diffusion studies, either focused on diffusion patterns or mechanisms, take fo...
© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013. All rights are reserved. Diffusion processes are a pr...
Policymakers have to adjudicate between two competing sets of information when making decisions: the...
We present an individual-level theory which explains how decision-making during the policy adoption ...
Policy diffusion research pays virtually no attention to policy content. Yet we should expect conten...
When modeling regional policy diffusion effects, scholars have traditionally made appeals to both so...
A growing literature in public policy, comparative politics and international relations has studied ...
The paper examines the determinants of the diffusion of state lotteries as a process of policy innov...
errors or mistakes are mine. 1 Boehmke I demonstrate a source of bias in the common implementation o...
Several authors (e.g., Brüderl, Diekmann, Yamaguchi) derive hazard rate models of event history anal...
This article builds on the recent policy diffusion literature and attempts to overcome one of its ma...
A comparative approach to policy diffusion work has recently yielded new and interesting results, as...
Two types of explanations of state government innovation have been proposed: internal determinants m...
This article makes a conceptual and theoretical contri- bution to the study of diffusion. The author...
Ideas often have a way of spreading. This is certainly true in the case of American states; innovati...
Quantitative-oriented diffusion studies, either focused on diffusion patterns or mechanisms, take fo...
© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013. All rights are reserved. Diffusion processes are a pr...
Policymakers have to adjudicate between two competing sets of information when making decisions: the...
We present an individual-level theory which explains how decision-making during the policy adoption ...