Abstract This paper examines the role that linguistic and cognitive prominence play in the resolution of anaphor–antecedent relationships. In two experiments, we found that pronouns are immediately sensitive to the cognitive prominence of potential antecedents when other antecedent selection cues are uninformative. In experiment 1, results suggest that despite their theoret-ical dissimilarities, topic and contrastive focus both serve to enhance cognitive prominence. Results from experi-ment 2 suggest that the contrastive prosody appropriate for focus constructions may also play an important role in enhancing cognitive prominence. Thus different types of linguistic prominence (topic, contrastive focus) ap-pear to have the common effect of in...
This paper presents the results of a series of on-line and off-line experiments which compare the in...
The goal of this study is to better understand when (and why) the combination of semantic overlap be...
Data used in the Interspeech 2022 paper "BERT, can HE predict contrastive focus? Predicting and cont...
Previous research has investigated anaphoric resolution at the anaphor. Using a self-paced reading s...
Traditionally, anaphor resolution focused on structural cues of the antecedent. Recently, the intera...
champoll [at] ling.upenn.edu Psycholinguistic experiments show that pronouns tend to be resolved dif...
Abstract. We present results from an online experiment designed to probe the cognitive underpinnings...
A controversial issue in anaphoric processing has been whether processing preferences of anaphoric e...
According to “Centering Theory”, an entity that links to the prior discourse could receive a...
German personal and demonstrative pronouns have distinct preferences in their interpretation; person...
Anaphora resolution is one of the most active research areas in natural language processing. This st...
The central claim of this thesis is that, unlike main clauses, adjunct subordinate clauses do not fo...
The semantic incorporation of nouns into predicates, like give a hug, is not morphologically marked ...
Interpreting sentences as part of a larger discourse requires evaluating information in the sentence...
Research has shown that following a sentence fragment such as John impressed Mary because…, people a...
This paper presents the results of a series of on-line and off-line experiments which compare the in...
The goal of this study is to better understand when (and why) the combination of semantic overlap be...
Data used in the Interspeech 2022 paper "BERT, can HE predict contrastive focus? Predicting and cont...
Previous research has investigated anaphoric resolution at the anaphor. Using a self-paced reading s...
Traditionally, anaphor resolution focused on structural cues of the antecedent. Recently, the intera...
champoll [at] ling.upenn.edu Psycholinguistic experiments show that pronouns tend to be resolved dif...
Abstract. We present results from an online experiment designed to probe the cognitive underpinnings...
A controversial issue in anaphoric processing has been whether processing preferences of anaphoric e...
According to “Centering Theory”, an entity that links to the prior discourse could receive a...
German personal and demonstrative pronouns have distinct preferences in their interpretation; person...
Anaphora resolution is one of the most active research areas in natural language processing. This st...
The central claim of this thesis is that, unlike main clauses, adjunct subordinate clauses do not fo...
The semantic incorporation of nouns into predicates, like give a hug, is not morphologically marked ...
Interpreting sentences as part of a larger discourse requires evaluating information in the sentence...
Research has shown that following a sentence fragment such as John impressed Mary because…, people a...
This paper presents the results of a series of on-line and off-line experiments which compare the in...
The goal of this study is to better understand when (and why) the combination of semantic overlap be...
Data used in the Interspeech 2022 paper "BERT, can HE predict contrastive focus? Predicting and cont...