While Participatory Action Research (PAR) is gaining a foothold in geographical research practice, universities and major funding bodies are imposing ethics review procedures that are inherently contradictory to doing PAR. This paper examines these paradoxes paying particular attention to the way that research participants and researchers are constructed differently in PAR and ethics review. The implications of these differences are then examined in the context of an ongoing research project and some modifications to ethics review processes are suggested
Recent work in human geography has articulated the principles of an emerging ‘participatory ethics’....
In the United States, the “common law,” that regulates ethics review is being overhauled. We ask how...
Participatory Health Research (PHR) continues to grow in popularity, based on the normative idea tha...
The development of participatory action research (PAR) reflects an ethical commitment to creating co...
A growing body of literature critical of ethics review boards has drawn attention to the processes u...
This case study examines the author's experience gaining ethics approval for an action research proj...
This article begins by raising issues around the way in which ethical approval for research is manag...
Action research has repeatedly demonstrated how it can facilitate problem solving and change in many...
This paper draws on a Participatory Action Research (PAR) project carried out in the secondary schoo...
Participatory research operates in a complex, dynamic social milieu and seeks to share the power inh...
ABSTRACT National and international codes of research conduct have been established in most industri...
Until recently, community organisations in Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ) have not had any avenue for eth...
Researchers conducting community-based participatory research (CBPR) often complain about research e...
Ethics review committees have become a common institution in English-speaking research communities, ...
The role of research ethics committees has expanded across the UK and North America and the process ...
Recent work in human geography has articulated the principles of an emerging ‘participatory ethics’....
In the United States, the “common law,” that regulates ethics review is being overhauled. We ask how...
Participatory Health Research (PHR) continues to grow in popularity, based on the normative idea tha...
The development of participatory action research (PAR) reflects an ethical commitment to creating co...
A growing body of literature critical of ethics review boards has drawn attention to the processes u...
This case study examines the author's experience gaining ethics approval for an action research proj...
This article begins by raising issues around the way in which ethical approval for research is manag...
Action research has repeatedly demonstrated how it can facilitate problem solving and change in many...
This paper draws on a Participatory Action Research (PAR) project carried out in the secondary schoo...
Participatory research operates in a complex, dynamic social milieu and seeks to share the power inh...
ABSTRACT National and international codes of research conduct have been established in most industri...
Until recently, community organisations in Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ) have not had any avenue for eth...
Researchers conducting community-based participatory research (CBPR) often complain about research e...
Ethics review committees have become a common institution in English-speaking research communities, ...
The role of research ethics committees has expanded across the UK and North America and the process ...
Recent work in human geography has articulated the principles of an emerging ‘participatory ethics’....
In the United States, the “common law,” that regulates ethics review is being overhauled. We ask how...
Participatory Health Research (PHR) continues to grow in popularity, based on the normative idea tha...