If there are no fictional characters, how do we explain thought and discourse apparently about them? If there are, what are they like? A growing number of philosophers claim that fictional characters are abstract objects akin to novels or plots. They argue that postulating characters provides the most straightforward explanation of our literary practices as well as a uniform account of discourse and thought about fiction. Anti-realists counter that postulation is neither necessary nor straightforward, and that the invocation of pretense provides a better account of the same phenomena. I outline and assess these competing theories
A No-Object theory of fiction denies that there is any sense of “object” in which the objects of fic...
In this entry I present one of the most hotly debated issues in contemporary analytic philosophy reg...
Putting into form a number of observations and developing an analysis on the status of fiction chara...
The first question to be addressed about fictional entities is: are there any? The usual grounds giv...
This paper defends a version of the realist view that fictional characters exist. It argues for an i...
There is no straightforward inference from there being fictional characters to any interesting form ...
In recent metaphysics, the questions of whether fictional entities exist, what their nature is, and ...
Fictional characters are awkward creatures. They are described as being girls, wizards and detective...
This paper takes up a series of basic philosophical questions about the nature and existence of fict...
Realists about fictional characters posit a certain theoretical role and a candidate to fill this ro...
According to many realist philosophers of fiction, one needs to posit an ontology of existing fictio...
According to artefactual theories of fiction, fictional characters are contingently existing abstra...
I advance an objection to Graham Priest’s account of fictional entities as nonexistent objects. Acco...
According to the artefactual theory of literature, fictional characters are contingently existing ab...
This paper is focused on the abstractist theory of fiction, namely, the semantic theory according to...
A No-Object theory of fiction denies that there is any sense of “object” in which the objects of fic...
In this entry I present one of the most hotly debated issues in contemporary analytic philosophy reg...
Putting into form a number of observations and developing an analysis on the status of fiction chara...
The first question to be addressed about fictional entities is: are there any? The usual grounds giv...
This paper defends a version of the realist view that fictional characters exist. It argues for an i...
There is no straightforward inference from there being fictional characters to any interesting form ...
In recent metaphysics, the questions of whether fictional entities exist, what their nature is, and ...
Fictional characters are awkward creatures. They are described as being girls, wizards and detective...
This paper takes up a series of basic philosophical questions about the nature and existence of fict...
Realists about fictional characters posit a certain theoretical role and a candidate to fill this ro...
According to many realist philosophers of fiction, one needs to posit an ontology of existing fictio...
According to artefactual theories of fiction, fictional characters are contingently existing abstra...
I advance an objection to Graham Priest’s account of fictional entities as nonexistent objects. Acco...
According to the artefactual theory of literature, fictional characters are contingently existing ab...
This paper is focused on the abstractist theory of fiction, namely, the semantic theory according to...
A No-Object theory of fiction denies that there is any sense of “object” in which the objects of fic...
In this entry I present one of the most hotly debated issues in contemporary analytic philosophy reg...
Putting into form a number of observations and developing an analysis on the status of fiction chara...