importance of Penrose’s (1959) contributions to the modern resource-based view of the firm. In particular, we take issue with Rugman and Verbeke’s (2002) arguments concerning Penrose’s (1959) contributions to our knowledge of: (1) the creation of competitive advantage, (2) sustaining competitive advantage, (3) isolating mechanisms, and (4) competitive advantage and economic rents. In our response, we show that Penrose (1959) has both directly and indirectly influenced the modern resource-based view of strategic management
Since the publication of Birger Wernerfelt's seminal article on the `Resource-based view of the firm...
This article examines the challenge of modifying orthodox ‘case study’ approaches to the growth of f...
and other research outputs Beyond strategy: a critical review of Penrose’s ‘single argument ’ and it...
scholars in the strategy field to be the seminal work that provided the intellectual foundations for...
Rugman and Verbeke (2002) established that Edith Penrose's contribution to the resource-based view i...
This study focuses on Penrose’s resource based approach and under explored insights that are of high...
This paper presents a revision and re-structuring of the Resources/ Capabilities/Competences (RCC) p...
This paper offers a critical review of the ‘single argument’ that underpins Penrose’s (1959) study, ...
[First paragraph] A review (in the pages of this journal) of a book published nearly fifty years ag...
The paper conducts a critical review of the ‘single argument’ that underpins Penrose’s (1959) study,...
This paper argues that not only Edith Penrose, but also Harold Demsetz should be seen as a dominant ...
This paper uses a cognitive theory of firms and organizations, with a focus on learning and innovati...
Edith Penrose and Josef Steindl each developed a distinctive analysis of the growth of firms. They u...
Abstract Studies on the performance of related and unrelated diversified firms have shown the for...
We apply insights from Edith Penrose’s work to extant theory of the multinational enterprise (MNE) a...
Since the publication of Birger Wernerfelt's seminal article on the `Resource-based view of the firm...
This article examines the challenge of modifying orthodox ‘case study’ approaches to the growth of f...
and other research outputs Beyond strategy: a critical review of Penrose’s ‘single argument ’ and it...
scholars in the strategy field to be the seminal work that provided the intellectual foundations for...
Rugman and Verbeke (2002) established that Edith Penrose's contribution to the resource-based view i...
This study focuses on Penrose’s resource based approach and under explored insights that are of high...
This paper presents a revision and re-structuring of the Resources/ Capabilities/Competences (RCC) p...
This paper offers a critical review of the ‘single argument’ that underpins Penrose’s (1959) study, ...
[First paragraph] A review (in the pages of this journal) of a book published nearly fifty years ag...
The paper conducts a critical review of the ‘single argument’ that underpins Penrose’s (1959) study,...
This paper argues that not only Edith Penrose, but also Harold Demsetz should be seen as a dominant ...
This paper uses a cognitive theory of firms and organizations, with a focus on learning and innovati...
Edith Penrose and Josef Steindl each developed a distinctive analysis of the growth of firms. They u...
Abstract Studies on the performance of related and unrelated diversified firms have shown the for...
We apply insights from Edith Penrose’s work to extant theory of the multinational enterprise (MNE) a...
Since the publication of Birger Wernerfelt's seminal article on the `Resource-based view of the firm...
This article examines the challenge of modifying orthodox ‘case study’ approaches to the growth of f...
and other research outputs Beyond strategy: a critical review of Penrose’s ‘single argument ’ and it...