Electronic voting systems offer the promise of more accurate voting, devoid of overvotes, hanging chads, and the like. But beyond checking for spoiled ballots, no tests have been conducted of the accuracy with which voters cast their ballots. Using data from a unique field experiment, we investigated the extent to which voters cast their votes as intended on six different voting systems. For a single office, in straightforward situations, roughly 97 percent voted the way they intended. However, about 20 percent of the voters made at least one error on their ballot. The most common error was inadvertently selecting th
In a participatory democracy where every vote counts, voters expect that every vote will be counted....
The Help America Vote Act of 2002 (HAVA) was a response to the controversial presidential election o...
The specific type of voting machine used by voters could have an affect on the amount of confidence ...
When election reforms such as Ranked Choice Voting or the Alternative Vote are proposed to replace p...
Many studies on electronic voting evaluate their usability in the context of simple elections. Compl...
The problems in the 2000 election in Florida focused national attention on the need for usable votin...
This paper reassesses the claim that electronic voting systems help voters to avoid common mistakes ...
Recent election administration research has investigated the reasons for voters making unintended er...
The aim of this paper is to identify user errors, and the related potential design deficiencies, tha...
We examine the relative performance of voting technologies by studying presidential, gubernatorial, ...
Different voting technologies present different challenges when questions are raised about whether a...
Voting technologies frame the voting experience. Different ways of presenting information to voters,...
The complexity of U.S. elections usually requires computers to count ballots—but computers can be ha...
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use ...
Mistakes made by humans, or machines, commonly arise when managing ballots cast in an election. In t...
In a participatory democracy where every vote counts, voters expect that every vote will be counted....
The Help America Vote Act of 2002 (HAVA) was a response to the controversial presidential election o...
The specific type of voting machine used by voters could have an affect on the amount of confidence ...
When election reforms such as Ranked Choice Voting or the Alternative Vote are proposed to replace p...
Many studies on electronic voting evaluate their usability in the context of simple elections. Compl...
The problems in the 2000 election in Florida focused national attention on the need for usable votin...
This paper reassesses the claim that electronic voting systems help voters to avoid common mistakes ...
Recent election administration research has investigated the reasons for voters making unintended er...
The aim of this paper is to identify user errors, and the related potential design deficiencies, tha...
We examine the relative performance of voting technologies by studying presidential, gubernatorial, ...
Different voting technologies present different challenges when questions are raised about whether a...
Voting technologies frame the voting experience. Different ways of presenting information to voters,...
The complexity of U.S. elections usually requires computers to count ballots—but computers can be ha...
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use ...
Mistakes made by humans, or machines, commonly arise when managing ballots cast in an election. In t...
In a participatory democracy where every vote counts, voters expect that every vote will be counted....
The Help America Vote Act of 2002 (HAVA) was a response to the controversial presidential election o...
The specific type of voting machine used by voters could have an affect on the amount of confidence ...